Doe v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Neb.

Plaintiff sued Defendants, the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, and several members of the UNMC’s staff, in their official and individual capacities, for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act, alleging that Defendants discriminated against him while he was a medical student at UNMC because of his chronic and recurrent depressive disorder disability. The district court dismissed the individual defendants in their individual capacities and granted summary judgment in favor of the remaining defendants. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court did not err in (1) granting summary judgment on Plaintiff’s ADA/Rehabilitation Act claims; (2) denying portions of Plaintiff’s motions to compel; and (3) failing to sua sponte schedule a hearing relating to Defendants’ alleged failure to comply with motions to compel that were granted.View "Doe v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Neb." on Justia Law